Technoeconomic Analysis of Chemical and Electrochemical Technologies
Technoeconomic analysis (TEA) is the translation and interpretation of a technical process or product with respect to its figures of merit. Figures of merit for a technical process are broad and include both raw material and process requirements – e.g., utilities, capital investment, and land. Figures of merit for a product are set by the characteristics of the design – e.g., mass, volume, cost, power, etc. TEA analysis is valuable for determining supply chain requirements, identifying the potential of alternative technologies, setting R&D priorities, tracking R&D progress, identifying bottlenecks & cost drivers, and evaluating/projecting product cost.
The TEA team within the Electrochemical Energy Storage (EES) theme (department) is engaged in the development of TEA models and analyses. The model development benefits from data and insights gained from theoretical and experimental developments within EES. The team reciprocates with analyses to quantify the merits of new materials and energy storage concepts.
The team is primarily supported by the U.S. Department of Energy (USDOE’s Vehicle Technologies Office), the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), and the National Highway and Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). The team also works with industry sponsors, often as a member of government-funded projects. The team’s main software product, the Battery Performance and Cost (BatPaC) model, is widely used by start-up and corporate developers of lithium-ion batteries, academic institutions, and policymakers.
Research Areas
The Battery Performance and Cost Model (BatPaC)
The Battery Performance and Cost (BatPaC) model receives high visibility because it is very detailed in its presentation of the battery design and cost structure, it is used by many government agencies, academia, and commercial entities, and because it is shared with battery researchers at no cost. The BatPaC model is a tool based on Microsoft® Office Excel spreadsheets that has been developed at Argonne for estimating the performance and manufacturing cost of lithium-ion batteries for electric-drive vehicles, including hybrid-electrics (HEV), plug-in hybrids (PHEV) and pure electrics (EV). The code has a range of default inputs for all parameters, which can also be overridden by the user. For example, BatPaC has pre-built libraries of electrode couples, pack configurations, and vehicle power/energy requirements. BatPaC is supported by several rigorous models that provide data, insights, and parameter/price estimates.
A full description of the model can be found in the manual. Please contact Shabbir Ahmed for a free copy of BatPaC.
Physics-Based Modeling
The team also develops physics-based, continuum-level models to better understand real-world performance and product design. These models can be zero to three-dimensional in space and can simulate electrochemical, thermal, and mechanical behavior throughout the life of the technology. Some examples include the use of these models to study:
- the influence of thermal and electrical design on the lifetime of lithium-ion battery modules
- the fast charge ability and limitations of lithium-ion batteries under electrochemical and thermal control
- the mechanical behavior of silicon electrodes in lithium-ion batteries
- the processes controlling dynamic charge acceptance and discharge capacity in lead batteries
Chemical Engineering Process Modeling
Process modeling is a key capability of the team and is used to understand the manufacturing of batteries and their precursor materials. The team develops process models for understanding the individual steps in battery manufacturing – e.g., solvent drying/recovery and dry room operation. Process models of key components are also used to identify critical materials and potential bottlenecks in the supply chain – e.g. cathode active material (CAM), lithium salt (LiF6), and lithium-metal production for batteries.
Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA)
The USDOE’s Vehicle Technology Office (VTO) conducts an annual evaluation of the cost of automotive lithium-ion batteries by considering the state-of-the-art parameter values achieved through its funded R&D portfolio. This analysis is conducted with the BatPaC model and is used as a tracking tool as part of the agency’s Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) obligations.
Past Contributors
Staff: Paul A. Nelson, Kevin G. Gallagher, Dennis W. Dees, David C. Robertson
Postdocs:Naresh Susarla, Juhyun Song, Hong-Keun Kim, Zhe Liu, Abhas Deva
Undergraduate Students:Sai Varanasi, Joshua Miao, Victoria Kulaga
Publications
- Energy Consumption of Lithium-Ion Pouch Cell Manufacturing Plants, Journal of Cleaner Production, 468 (2024) 143050.
- Cost Analysis and Projections for U.S.-Manufactured Automotive Lithium-ion Batteries, ANL/CSE-24/1, (2024).
- Parametric Study of Lithium-Ion Batteries using BatPaC, ANL/CSE-23/1, (2023).
- From material properties to device metrics: a data-driven guide to battery design, Energy Advances, 2 (2023) 1326-1350.
- A New Analytical Expression for Estimating the Adiabatic Temperature Rise in Lithium-Ion Batteries During High-Power Pulses, J. Electrochem. Soc., 170 (2023) 020515.
- Battery Performance and Cost Modeling for Electric-Drive Vehicles: A Manual for BatPaC v5.0, ANL/CSE-22/1, (2022).
- The influence of temperature on area-specific impedance and capacity of Li-ion cells with nickel-containing positive electrodes, J. Power Sources, 543 (2022) 231864.
- Pathways towards managing cost and degradation risk of fast charging cells with electrical and thermal controls, Energy Environ. Sci., 14 (2021) 6564-6573.
- Comparing total cost of ownership of battery electric vehicles and internal combustion engine vehicles, Energy Policy, 158 (2021) 112564.
- Modulating electrode utilization in lithium-ion cells with silicon-bearing anodes, J. Power Sources, 477 (2020) 229029.
- Estimating the cost and energy demand of producing LMO for Li-ion batteries, ANL/CSE-20/1, (2020).
- Estimating cost and energy demand in producing lithium hexafluorophosphate for Li-ion battery electrolyte, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 58 (2019) 3754−3766.
- Cost of automotive lithium-ion batteries operating at high upper cutoff voltages, J. Power Sources, 403 (2018) 56–65.
- Modeling and analysis of solvent removal during Li-ion battery electrode drying, J. Power Sources, 378 (2018) 660–670.
- Enabling fast charging: A battery technology gap assessment, J. Power Sources, 367 (2017) 250-262.
- Technical and economic analysis of solvent-based lithium-ion electrode drying with water and NMP, Drying Technology, 36 (2018) 234-244.
- Cost and energy demand of producing nickel manganese cobalt cathode material for lithium ion batteries, J. Power Sources, 342 (2017) 733-740.
- Study of a dry room in a battery manufacturing plant using a process model, J. Power Sources, 326 (2016) 490-497.
- Energy impact of cathode drying and solvent recovery during lithium-ion battery manufacturing, J. Power Sources, 322 (2016) 169-178.
- Cost savings for manufacturing lithium batteries in a flexible plant, J. Power Sources, 283 (2015) 506-516.