Skip to main content
Biosciences Division

Subsurface Biogeochemical Research

The long-term goal of the Argonne Wetland Hydrobiogeochemistry Scientific Focus Area is to develop a mechanistic understanding and ability to model the coupled hydrological, geochemical, and biological processes controlling water quality in wetlands.
Critical components of the Tims Branch riparian wetland (sediment, rhizosphere, and stream) at the Savannah River Site that, in concert with each other, control water quality.

Wetlands are landscape features where standing water is present all or part of the time. Within wetlands, the movement of water and the biogeochemically catalyzed transformations of its constituents determine the mobility of nutrients and contaminants, the emission of greenhouse gasses into the atmosphere, carbon (C ) cycling and sequestration in subsurface environments, and the quality of water itself. In terms of mass action as well as the extent of integration with other elemental cycles, biogeochemical processes within wetlands are largely driven by C biogeochemistry. Iron (Fe) and sulfur (S) are also abundant elements that are often found in wetlands. Their redox cycling is driven largely by microbial activity, and they are a significant component of major and minor elemental cycling and energy flux. In addition to greatly affecting elemental cycling and transport, wetlands provide many critical ecosystem services, such as water storage. While water availability is often a concern within arid regions of the western United States, higher population densities, continued residential and industrial development, and the importance of water in energy production also create strong concerns about water quality in the more humid parts of the eastern United States. In addition, extreme weather events and encroachment by humans can contribute to changes in water inputs and outputs, as well as the biogeochemical interactions within wetlands and the biota associated with them. Finally, although they are important, the explicit hydrologically driven wetland biogeochemical functions that control C, nutrient, and contaminant cycling and water quality are still not understood well enough to be adequately modeled. This is due in part to deficiencies in our current understanding of the complex and dynamic hydrologically driven biogeochemical processes that occur in wetlands.

The long-term, 10-yr objective of the Argonne Wetland Hydrobiogeochemistry Scientific Focus Area (SFA) is the development of a mechanistic understanding and ability to model the coupled hydrological, geochemical, and biological processes controlling water quality in wetlands and the implications of these processes for watersheds commonly found in humid regions of the United States. To accomplish this, the Argonne Wetland Hydrobiogeochemistry SFA is studying wetland hydrobiogeochemistry with a focus on a riparian wetland field site at the Savannah River Site (SRS). The wetlands lie within Tims Branch at the SRS, whose waters ultimately flow into the Savannah River approximately 20 km downstream. This site is representative of many riparian wetlands found in the humid regions of the Southeast that have C‑rich soils and high Fe content. However, it is unique in that it received large amounts of contaminant metals (Ni, Cr, Cu, Pb) and uranium (U) as a result of previous industrial-scale manufacturing of fuel and target assemblies at the M-Area Facility. Therefore, the function of the wetlands in relation to control of water quality, including the concentration of metals and U within the soluble and particulate components of groundwater and surface waters of Tims Branch, is a risk driver for DOE Environmental Management. 

Members of the Argonne Wetland Hydrobiogeochemistry SFA, whose efforts are directly supported by the SFA or bring complementary expertise via synergistic collaboration, represent the critical components required to obtain our 10-yr objective.  Members of the team from Argonne who are directly supported by the SFA include Kemner (PI, Biogeochemistry, Synchrotron Science), O’Loughlin (Co-PI, Biogeochemistry, Environmental Chemistry/Microbiology), and Weisenhorn (Wetland Ecology and Microbial Modeling). Members of the team from outside of Argonne who are directly supported by the SFA include Boyanov (Bulgarian Academy of Science, Physical Chemistry, Synchrotron Science), Kaplan (SRNL, Soil Science), Seaman (Savannah River Ecology Laboratory, University of Georgia, Study-site instrumentation and data collection), and Segre (Illinois Institute of Technology, Synchrotron Science, Assoc. Dir. of the Materials Research Collaborative Access Team/Environmental Collaborative Access Team [MRCAT/EnviroCAT] at the Advanced Photon Source [APS]).  Members of the SFA who are not directly supported by SFA funds are supported through a variety of other means. Many have been collaborating with the SFA for many years, have a proven record of productivity, and have alternative sources of support to synergistically work with the SFA team. Through other collaborative projects supported by other means, some institutions provide additional support to the project by supplying graduate students and postdocs, and by supporting visiting researcher sabbaticals at Argonne. Members of the team from specific institutions and their scientific expertise are Clemson (University class field trips to map U concentrations in the field, EPSCoR project): Powell (Actinide Chemist, geochemical and reactive transport modeling), Martinez (Radiobiologist), and Moysey (Geophysics); Florida International University (DOE Environmental Management): Lawrence and Mahmoudi (Hydrological Modeling of Tims Branch watershed); Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) (Environmental Molecular Science Laboratory [EMSL]): Hess (Environmental Chemistry, EMSL CESD Integrative Lead), Tfaily (Organic Chemist), Pasa-Tolic (EMSL Science lead for mass spectrometry); Korea University: Kwon (Environmental Engineering, Biogeochemistry); China University of Geosciences (111 Project for Visiting Researchers, Groundwater Contamination and Remediation): Yan (Geochemistry), Wang (Biogeochemistry and President of the China University of Geosciences), Dong (Microbiology, Biogeochemistry), Deng (Wetland Biogeochemistry); Universidade Federal de Alfenas: Rodriguez (Environmental Engineering, Biochemistry, wastewater treatment and floc formation); Argonne National Laboratory (KBase): Henry (Metabolic Modeling, KBase PI at Argonne); Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL) (ENIGMA, KBase): Adams (Microbiology, ENIGMA Co-PI), Arkin (Microbiology, ENIGMA PI, KBase PI at LBNL), and Chakraborty (Microbiology, ENIGMA-supported researcher); University of Leeds: Mishra (Synchrotron characterization of C and S speciation). 

The overarching hypothesis of our work is that hydrologically driven biogeochemical processes that create redox dynamic conditions from the nanometer to meter scales are a major driver of groundwater and surface water quality within riparian wetland environments. A focus on major (e.g., C and Fe) biogeochemical cycles and their controls on U hydrobiogeochemistry and water quality within the Tims Branch wetlands builds on decades of synchrotron-based biogeochemistry and omics-based microbial community research expertise previously developed within the Argonne Subsurface Biogeochemical Research (SBR) Program SFA. In addition, the focus on hydrobiogeochemistry within a riparian wetland in the Southeastern United States complements and expands the portfolio of existing SBR SFA field site testbeds concerned with the Biogeochemistry of Actinides (LLNL SFA), mountainous watersheds (LBNL SFA), shallow alluvial groundwater systems (Stanford Linear Accelerator [SLAC] SFA), hydropower-impacted and highly managed rivers (PNNL SFA), and critical terrestrial-aquatic interfaces within streams (ORNL SFA) in both arid and humid regions of the United States that play major roles in controlling groundwater and surface water quality. As such, this Science Plan aligns with the SBR program within the Climate and Environmental Science (CESD) Division of the DOE Biological and Environmental Research (BER). In addition, because wetlands, by definition, encompass both terrestrial and aquatic environments, our investigation of the Tims Branch riparian wetlands and watershed complement burgeoning efforts within the Terrestrial Ecosystem Science Program of BER to better understand critical earth system terrestrial-aquatic interfaces.

We identified three major components (focus areas) of the Tims Branch riparian wetland that represent critical zones containing hydrologically driven biogeochemical drivers, which determine water quality: sediment, rhizosphere, and stream. These three focus areas are interdependent and must be considered as a whole for a systems-level understanding of our overarching hypothesis. Within these three focus areas, we identified two common thematic knowledge gaps that inhibit our ability to predict controls on water quality:

  1. In-depth understanding of the molecular-scale biogeochemical processes that affect Fe, C, and contaminant speciation within the wetland sediment, rhizosphere, and stream environments; and 
  2. In-depth understanding of hydrologically driven biogeochemical controls on the mass transfer of Fe, C, and contaminants within wetland sediment, rhizosphere, and stream environments.

Holistically addressing 18 specific hypotheses related to these two knowledge gaps within the sediment, rhizosphere, and stream environments organizes the SFA in its development of a hydrobiogeochemical conceptual model of the Tims Branch riparian wetland.

From the beginning of this project, we strongly emphasize our integrated lab- and field-based experimental research and field monitoring. This enables us to derive key model parameters as we simultaneously develop the mechanistic understanding necessary for modeling approaches to predict wetland controls on water quality. Materials collected from sediment, rhizosphere, and stream environments will be analyzed to identify major hydrologically driven biogeochemical processes that affect surface and ground water within wetlands. Besides standard analysis approaches, we will use unique capabilities (synchrotron-based approaches at the APS at Argonne, omics-based approaches and collaborative research with KBase researchers at Argonne and LBNL, and mass spectrometry-based approaches to characterize C chemistry through collaboration with scientists at the EMSL at PNNL) to analyze field and lab materials.

The modeling approaches we are integrating with our work in the early years of this project are limited primarily to reactive transport models (RTMs) of lab-based mixed batch reactors, diffusive and advective flow experiments, and small-scale field observations. We supplement RTMs with metabolic modeling of organisms and interacting consortia to more accurately capture the role of microbial communities in mediating biogeochemical transformations. These models are used for hypothesis testing, and to analyze the sensitivity of hydrobiogeochemical processes in determining water quality. In addition, the iterations between lab- and field-based experiments in concert with modeling improve both aspects of the work. In later years of the SFA, we envision a stronger emphasis on field-scale observations and characterizations and their coupling with hydrological system model development of the Tims Branch riparian watershed to explain the particulate and soluble fractions of nutrient and contaminant element transport via surface water and groundwater flow. 

A preliminary hydrological model has already been developed for the Tims Branch. It is critical for ultimately modeling coupled hydrological and biogeochemical controls, and it provides key insights and data related to surface water and groundwater flow within the watershed. These are critical for identifying hydrological drivers of the biogeochemical processes to be studied and to be integrated into RTMs. Finally, the hydrological model of Tims Branch (~6 km in length) we will develop—with reactive transport models embedded within it—will enable us to explore the effect of these integrated models on the National Water Model, which makes use of 1-km grids.