Building Scientific Computing Ecosystems for AI-Enabled Discovery
Artificial intelligence (AI) is changing scientific computing rapidly. AI systems can now generate and analyze code, synthesize information, assist with hypothesis generation and carry out complex reasoning tasks within scientific workflows. Alongside advances in computing architectures and data-intensive research, these capabilities are reshaping how scientific work is conducted.
But the challenge for the scientific community is not simply to make research faster. It is to build scientific computing ecosystems that can harness these capabilities while preserving rigor, transparency, accountability and human judgment — and enabling new forms of collaboration and discovery.
That was the focus of the 2026 Toward Next-Generation Ecosystems for Scientific Computing workshop, held April 14–16 in Chicago. The workshop brought together researchers and practitioners from universities, national laboratories, industry and other organizations to consider how scientific computing ecosystems should evolve as AI becomes a more active participant in research.
The workshop was the second in a three-year series organized by Lois Curfman McInnes and collaborators as part of her 2024 DOE Office of Science Distinguished Scientist Fellowship. Building on the first workshop in 2025, this year’s discussions moved from identifying challenges toward developing strategic priorities and actions for the community.
The resulting report, “Toward Next-Generation Ecosystems for Scientific Computing: Harnessing Community, Software, and AI for Cross-Disciplinary Team Science,” identifies four interdependent strategic themes: software ecosystems for AI-enabled scientific discovery; trust, validation and traceability; human-AI teaming and paradigm shifts; and workforce, pedagogy and governance.
Designing Ecosystems That Can Evolve
The report uses the term ecosystem in a broad sense, encompassing the technical, social and organizational structures that shape scientific computing — from hardware, software, data and workflows to people, institutions, incentives and community practices. The goal is to create an environment that can adapt as scientific needs and technologies change.
This perspective is important as AI evolves from being a tool used by researchers toward becoming an active participant in scientific workflows. As this happens, questions about validation, provenance, accountability and the role of human expertise become more pressing.
The workshop identified four areas where this evolution will be especially important.
Building sustainable software ecosystems
Essential to the development of effective software ecosystems are shared research assets. These involve far more than providing access to computing facilities. Shared research assets include reusable software, datasets, metadata, workflows, benchmarks, validation examples and documentation. These assets capture knowledge, context, assumptions and computational approaches in forms that can be reused across projects and communities.
These shared assets can help researchers understand, extend and validate complex workflows, particularly as AI, accelerator-based computing and emerging technologies become increasingly interconnected. The report also emphasizes the importance of usability: helping researchers identify appropriate methods and their limitations for addressing a scientific problem.
Making trust and traceability part of the design
The report calls for trust-related capabilities — including verification, validation, uncertainty quantification, provenance, traceability, transparency and auditability — to become core design requirements.
As AI-enabled workflows move from exploratory use of AI to scientific analysis and decision-making, traditional approaches to verification, validation and uncertainty quantification may not be sufficient. These approaches must be extended with methods tailored to hybrid workflows that combine mechanistic models, numerical methods, AI systems, surrogate models and human judgment.
Scientific software presents special challenges regarding trust requirements. Such software can run without producing an obvious technical error and still generate scientifically misleading results. Conventional tests may not detect these situations, particularly when AI is rapidly generating or modifying software code. The workshop participants stressed the need for new mathematically and statistically grounded approaches to evaluating AI-enabled scientific workflows.
Moving from taskwork to teamwork
The report distinguishes between taskwork — the activities needed to accomplish a particular goal — and teamwork, which concerns how people and AI systems coordinate effectively toward that goal. As AI takes on more taskwork, effective teamwork becomes increasingly important.
Adding more agents to tasks does not automatically improve a workflow. Human researchers remain essential for framing scientific questions, combining domain and computational knowledge, evaluating evidence, managing uncertainty and interpreting unexpected results. The appropriate balance between automation and human involvement will depend on the task, with higher-risk or higher-consequence activities requiring greater transparency, validation and human judgment.
The workshop report also emphasizes the importance of giving early-career researchers practical experience with human-AI teamwork through fellowships, internships, apprenticeships and cross-sector research projects.
Preparing a workforce for continual change
The skills needed for scientific computing are changing alongside the technology. Training therefore needs to extend beyond programming to include critical thinking, evaluation of evidence, reasoning under uncertainty, verification, reproducibility, communication and responsible use of AI-enabled tools.
The report’s workforce roadmap emphasizes multiple pathways for students, practitioners and institutional leaders, recognizing that people enter scientific computing at different stages and in different roles.
Rather than preparing people for a particular generation of tools, the goal is to develop competencies that remain valuable as technologies evolve. The workshop also identified a need to understand how AI may change scientific roles, behavior, institutions and career pathways over time.
From Workshop Themes to Community Action
The central message of the workshop report is that the longstanding ecosystem challenges intensified by AI cannot be addressed by individual projects or organizations acting alone. Building effective scientific ecosystems will require coordination among researchers, universities, national laboratories, the private sector, funders and professional societies.
Based on the opportunities and needs presented under the four themes, the report identifies eight areas for community action. Near-term efforts should strengthen shared research assets, trust infrastructure, human-AI teaming practices and incentives for scientific software stewardship. Pilot projects should explore new approaches for coordinating multiple AI agents and multiple institutions while also investigating ways to help users make better-informed choices throughout research workflows. Longitudinal studies should examine how AI affects the workplace, professional roles and team behavior and should evaluate whether AI-enabled ecosystems improve scientific and engineering practice.
Building Better Science, Not Simply Faster Science
AI can accelerate parts of scientific work, but speed alone is not progress. The relevant question is whether AI-enabled ecosystems support valid, interpretable and creative discovery. Meeting that standard requires more than technical capability: software, data, people, institutions, incentives and community practices must evolve together through feedback, adaptation and stewardship.
As the report concludes, “Done well, these ecosystems can accelerate discovery and expand scientific inquiry while preserving the rigor, transparency, accountability and collaboration on which progress and public benefit depend.”
Those attending SC26 are invited to join the conversation Tuesday, November 17 at BOF: Ecosystems for Scientific Computing in the Age of AI.
Read the Full Report
The complete workshop report, Toward Next-Generation Ecosystems for Scientific Computing: Harnessing Community, Software, and AI for Cross-Disciplinary Team Science, L. C. McInnes et al., is available for download: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.26519.
Argonne National Laboratory seeks solutions to pressing national problems in science and technology by conducting leading-edge basic and applied research in virtually every scientific discipline. Argonne is managed by UChicago Argonne, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Science.
The U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Science is the single largest supporter of basic research in the physical sciences in the United States and is working to address some of the most pressing challenges of our time. For more information, visit https://energy.gov/science.